Wow, what just happened! In the last 33 days we saw an incumbent US President forced out of his re-election campaign, financial markets take a battering, Japan’s Nikkei dropping 20% in just two days’ trading, the Republican National Convention celebrate polls predicting the second-coming of their Cheesus, and a likely funds-deprived military capitulation of Ukraine to Agent Orange’s mate in the Kremlin. It was all rather scary and in the financial markets the ‘fear gauge’ measured by an options derivative, the VIX index, rocketed from its long-run median level of $17.6 to $60 on the 5th August. In fact, that was the largest single-day increase in the ‘fear index’ in history. Then, over the next 7 days it fell right back to its average $17 level. Incredible. But, not even the VIX could have foretold the emergence of the ‘joyful warrior’ Kamala Harris as the pollsters’ best current bet for the White House in the November election, nor the invasion of Russian territory for the first time since 1941 by Ukrainian soldiers (in German tanks!!). These are amazing geopolitical turnarounds but not necessarily the type of shocks to move financial markets. However, we’d like you to think about a few developments which really could shock….in a good way.
Productivity: The scary headlines would suggest recent ‘revisions’ of US jobs data revealed a less healthy US employment picture. The revisions showed that the statisticians over-counted the number of jobs created in the year to March 2024 by 818,000. However, before we go all wobbly-kneed about job creation moving at a pace of ‘only’ 175,000 new jobs per month (vs previous estimate of 245,000) we need to consider that US GDP growth numbers have not changed. This means that labour productivity which has stalled for decades is picking up serious speed. Hmmm. Anyone tempted to ask ChatGPT what’s going on? Well, our AI boom might be beginning to pay dividends but in a more subtle way. Probably the best read of the week is a guest contribution by Brian Albrecht, Chief Economist at the International Centre for Law & Economics, on Noah Smith’s always excellent blog. Two snippets really hit home with me. First, the subtle impact of AI:
To be clear, the progress isn’t about chatbots. Instead, it’s about small improvements across every sector of the economy. It’s the human resources manager using AI to sift through resumes more efficiently, the logistics planner optimizing delivery routes in real-time, or the data analyst automating report generation. These minor advances, multiplied across millions of workers and thousands of businesses, are what will ultimately drive significant productivity gains.
Second, massive change in productivity could be already under way but is hidden by upfront costs like training, reorganizing workflows and designing new processes:
The computer revolution offers a helpful parallel. In 1987, Nobel laureate Robert Solow famously quipped, “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.” This “productivity paradox” persisted for years. It’s almost comical now to think of 1987—when the original Macintosh was brand new, and C++ was just gaining traction—as an era when “the computer age was everywhere.” Even then, the transformative potential of computers was clear to many observers. Despite the invention of the personal computer in the 1970s, we didn’t see significant productivity gains until the late 1990s. Why? It took time for businesses to figure out how to use computers effectively, redesign workflows, and develop complementary innovations.
My own sense of things is that we are obsessing over generative AI (chat bots) and missing the integration of AI applications which have been around far longer than ChatGPT or Gemini; think machine learning, automation, robotics, virtual assistants etc. Of course, with far more powerful digital assistance available this has a potentially huge impact on the formation of new companies.
New Business Formation: The US Census Bureau shows that 5.5 million businesses were started in 2023. This is the highest total ever and is a 57% increase on the numbers prior to Covid in 2019. Recent data from Ryan Decker and John Haltiwanger at the US Federal Reserve showed a surge in new business formation, particularly in hi-tech industries. But, there’s a pick-up in business formation in sectors like construction and building services too. These trends point to fresh ideas, innovation and pressure on incumbents to keep pace. It also points to higher productivity ahead. Our reference to ‘old economy’ activities like construction is deliberate because there is another forgotten sector beginning to stir.
Critical Materials: This week the price of a gold bar reached $1 million for the first time ever. I’m no gold bug and I really don’t want to get into a philosophical debate about stores of wealth and inflation protection. But, I do know one thing. Gold tends to lead when the mining sector is due a recovery. Mining has been in the naughty corner for almost 15 years but I’m beginning to wonder whether sovereign anxiety over the supply of critical materials will lead to not just regulatory action (see the EU Critical Raw Materials Act) but actual sovereign/state investment in mining assets? If AI is now considered by nearly all experts as a sovereign-level risk race then the sector critical to industrial supply chains and decarbonising the planet could be about to receive its own positive sovereign attention.
Electric Vehicles: Finally, on the theme of global decarbonisation, we could be on the cusp of a serious acceleration in electric vehicle (EV) adoption. Consider the following three developments:
*For the first time ever in July, more than half of all vehicles sold in China were electric.
*BMW pulled ahead of Tesla as the lead EV brand in Europe last month for the first time. Note to Elon Musk, Silicon Valley “broligarchs” and a few tech heads closer to home; funding a felon can be brand destructive.
*Electric vehicles are now cheaper than combustion models in China.
So, the competitive landscape is broadening out with Chinese and European players catching up with Tesla. This also means production of EVs is ramping up as market penetration of the total auto market approaches 20%. This production volume surge also has cost implications. According to Wright’s Law, used by MIT and proven in the wind and solar markets, when production of an item doubles the cost of producing that item falls by 20%. Critical to the EV revolution is the cost of lithium-ion batteries, and the cost of those batteries has fallen by 90% since 2010. Indeed, as the headline above suggested, China has reached a critical market penetration inflection point. Given the cost of batteries in China have fallen by 51% in just the last year, one can understand why EVs are racing past combustion models. Get ready for the virtuous circle of more production, lower costs and accelerated consumer adoption globally.
All four developments above are capable of delivering significant positive shocks to the global economy and could be perfectly timed for a joyful new US President. Whoodathunk!
