Well, this is awkward. Perhaps the only fully bipartisan view in Washington these days is that China’s economic influence needs to be curtailed. The Biden administration has just announced further Chinese import tariffs and the push to decouple from Beijing’s giant manufacturing machine is in full swing. Thanks to the Bidenomics IRA and Chips Acts, a wave of multi-billion dollar projects in cleantech (EV batteries, renewable energy etc) and critical computing technology (AI chips, fab construction etc) have landed in the US. Arguably, Europe is on the homeshoring case too, particularly in the EV and cleantech areas. However, while the world focuses this week on the current ‘big shiny thing’ in the guise of AI – and pending results from its $2 trillion poster child Nvidia – the more significant global economic story right now is probably China.
You might have read headlines about Chinese electric vehicles piling up at ports around the world but there’s much more going on. Chinese export surpluses are exploding as global markets are flooded with not just cars but steel, chips, solar panels, clothing, machinery and many other manufactured goods. It feels like the Beijing regime is compensating for a debt-slowed domestic economy by ramping up its manufacturing and export efforts. Check out the following data points:
*Chinese steel exports in April amounted to 92 million tons, up 16%.
*Chinese car exports reached 417,000 units in April, up 38%.
*Chinese aluminum output hit all-time highs in recent weeks.
*Chinese exports of key cleantech items – batteries, EV cars, solar panels – hit $150 billion in 2023 by growing 20%.
In fact, despite decoupling attempts in the US and official ‘dumping’ complaints from the EU, China’s current account surplus is at all-time highs powered by exports worth more than $3.5 trillion. One might presume the impact of flooding markets with cheap goods would be deflationary but that ignores the sheer scale of domestic Chinese consumption. It also ignores the reality right now in financial markets. I would highlight three markets in particular:
- Commodities markets: Copper, iron and zinc prices have jumped by 10% in the past 30 days. Copper has actually clocked up a 30% gain in 2024 alone.
- Chinese stocks: Despite US tariffs, banking debt issues and a moribund domestic economy the benchmark stock market, the Shanghai Composite Index, is up 7.6% this year after 3 years of negative returns. In Hong Kong, the news is even better with a 15% gain after 4 painful years of losses.
- German stocks: You’d think they’d learn but, fresh from a painful Russian energy dependency experience, Germany’s industrial base is perceived as heavily exposed to China’s economic activity. That strategic risk is for another day’s discussion but, for now, investors are buying German shares and driving the DAX benchmark to all-time highs. Arguably, a China ramp up of activity is helping investor sentiment towards German stocks.
There’s a part of me wondering has China become too big and therefore nobody else can compete with the scale and unit costs of their manufacturing base? It’s probably too early to jump to conclusions and the domestic property debt unwind has a long way to go as Japan financial historians will attest. However, there is clearly a Beijing long-term strategy in play now. I would highly recommend the recent article from Noah Smith as to potential current Politburo thinking but these three thoughts stood out for me:
*China wants to dominate and be the ‘world’s manufacturer’.
*China is balancing overproduction and a weak consumer with a compensatory export ramp up.
*China is preparing its manufacturing base for flexibility and the capacity to switch to war production mode.
The final strategic explainer is more than slightly concerning. So, let’s not over-hype the significance of Nvidia’s results this week. The AI revolution and Nvidia, as barometer of that manic race to technological superiority, is almost irrelevant if China is putting itself on a war footing. On a more upbeat note, the upturn in Chinese economic activity could be the beginning of a significant global economic recovery and a rotation away from technology into ‘old economy’ assets. Regular readers will recognise that thought from previous writings here. Of course, that broadening out of investor confidence will help bulls, portfolios and pensions in the near term but not even the best generative AI model can really tell us what China wants to do in the long run. And remember, the Russian bear experience is that we should probably believe what we are seeing.
