The lettuces won’t be happy. It looks like the UK’s new Chancellor of The Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, and her Autumn Budget 2024 will survive a relatively benign financial market reaction. So far, government debt (Gilts) markets are stable and the domestic-focused FTSE 250 stock index has bounced slightly. Liz Truss will shake her head in delusion but the more understanding reality of today’s world is that the government of the world’s 5th biggest economy was brought down by international asset traders back in October 2022. It probably won’t be the last sovereign state to lose power to commercial interests and yes, money. Simply put, at exactly the wrong moment in time, many of the world’s governments’ ATM spending cards are about to be declined. Check out the following recent headlines:
Interest payments on the national debt (US) top $1 trillion as deficit swells – CNBC
IMF warns Japan of debt deterioration in the event of future shock – The Japan Times
Why France’s fiscal freak out matters to the world – Axios
China’s Fiscal Package Aims To Ease Debt Woes, Property Crisis – Asia Financial
There’s never a good time for fiscal capacity to be tight. But… literally the planet’s survival is at stake. The climate crisis is everyone’s crisis but governments are expected to lead. Indeed, according to the IEA, governments globally in 2023 spent $1.3 trillion or 1.2% of global GDP on clean energy investment. That bill will surely rise but there’s a big question mark over how the clean energy transition will be funded by stretched governments running record deficits and the highest debt burdens in history. For a clue to that question, let’s take a look at another spending race.
This race depending on your perspective also has an existential angle. The race, of course, is AI and Packy McCormack’s excellent piece in his Not Boring newsletter has identified a shift in commercial goal – “companies are spending for capability as opposed to straightforward ROI”. Why the ditching of seeking returns on investment? Apparently, the first company to create the AI “Digital God” boils down to an existential pursuit. Loser companies die. Indeed, Larry Page of Google fame has reportedly said many times internally…..
“I am willing to go bankrupt rather than lose this race”
That feels like extremely high stakes thinking. It might explain another development in the world’s most advanced technology economy. It’s one thing for a government to depend on a private company, SpaceX, to conduct an international space rescue mission. But, it’s quite another to see SpaceX’s owner Elon Musk in the words of VP hopeful, Tim Walz, “skipping like a dipshit” at various Trump rallies. Musk may cause me involuntary eye-rolls every time I read him on X or see him on TV but he’s a super-successful builder of future technologies. In fact, he has feet in both existential races with Tesla (climate) and xAI (AI) which is about to raise funds at a $40 billion valuation. If the latter doesn’t feel like an existential race, maybe the monies will convince you. In 2023, just 4 companies – Facebook, Amazon, Google and Microsoft – spent $196 billion or 0.72% of US GDP on AI research and infrastructure. Remember, these companies are really only ‘getting ready’. Furthermore, they are arguably investing at levels which historically would have only been within the compass of sovereign governments.
I remember reading first about social media companies becoming effectively supra-sovereign powers. At the time, Facebook had 2.5 billion people on its platform, multiples of any other country populations on the planet. Now social media steers business and moves elections, but tech money might be about to go one step further. Forget about tech companies currently rolling out nuclear power for their hyper-scaling data centres. What about a seat in government? Well, Elon Musk is on the cusp of entering a Trump ministerial cabinet with a role brief focused on cost cutting. I will give you a clue; plenty of those cuts will be in the regulatory, business and tech governance areas. Musk is not alone. Racist rallies in Madison Square Garden or not, big business is keen to put on the Orange war paint for Trump chaos and……… commercial insurance or favour. Check out the latest Trump luvvies from the world of business:
Winklevoss Twins donate $1m each to Trump as champion of cryptocurrency – The Guardian
Steve Schwarzmann says Trump would be “efficient and effective” president this time – Business Insider
Silicon Valley’s Andreesson Horowitz give Millions to Trump – Bloomberg
Billionaire Ken Griffin says “expectation today is that Donald Trump will win the White House” – Fortune
Washington Post flooded by cancellations after Bezos non-endorsement decision – NPR
Ooooohh what would Washington Post legends Katherine Graham or Ben Bradlee think in this “Fat Nixon” era? It would appear big tech and big money “broligarchs” see Trump support as commercial insurance at the very least, and possibly a route to unfettered, compliance-light opportunity. One could become dispirited about the overt involvement of big business in politics. But, in reality business was always there in the Washington background. However, it’s not just a US phenomenon.
Europe has had its share of big business influence on policy. In the UK, they have had trade and Brexit. In Germany, it was the powerful industrial sector and its push for cheap(then) dependency on Russian energy. We will say no more on either policy disaster, except there might be an intellectual reason why US business leaders are in a different universe of wealth creation compared to their strategically inept European counterparts.
On a final more serious note, perhaps the difference this time is that governments really do need the balance sheets, cash and spending power of big tech. Just six US technology companies – Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and Nvidia – have a combined market value of $15 trillion. For context, that $15 trillion equates to the GDP of China as recently as 2020. In this writer’s reluctant view, politicians have two options – tax these guys or become partners. It might seem distasteful but public-private partnership is now an existential fact of life….or death.
Gotta dip with the dipshits.
